I watched a couple of minutes here and there on C-Span. Just couldn't take it. Spent the rest of the time doing refreshes on various bloggers that were live-blogging it. Powerline, Captain's Quarters, VodkaPundit, and The Corner. Powerline and VodkaPundit seem to be on the fastest servers--fastest refreshes. Lots of fun stuff. I'm jealous of the speed and wit of Stephen Green.
I get tired of politicians sacrificing truth for good lines. "we shouldn't be building fire houses in Baghdad when we're closing them at home." What does one have to do with the other? Fire houses in the US are local--municipalities. The federal gov't doesn't have anything to do with it. A false choice.
Prescription drugs--people going without their drugs while the drug companies reap windfall profits. Where the hell does he think new drugs come from? More and more, US companies are becoming the primary source of drug research and new drugs. In a lot of the countries that regulate drug prices, their drug companies have abandoned research--it doesn't pay. The American drug buyer (sounds seedy) is in effect subsidizing those countries drug plans--which is wrong, but jumping on the bandwagon won't fix the problem. And no one talks about how in many of these countries, newer drugs are not available. Just like they don't talk about the real price of socialized medicine. The long waiting times for anything other than life-threatening conditions. Canada has a 2-tier system: the Canadian system and ours--people who can afford to come across the border to US doctors and hospitals--not just the wealthy either.
With the Democrats it's always money for nothing and the chicks are free. That's why I finally gave up on them. They just go with any idea that sounds good and pretend there are no consequences. Upping the minimum wage--sounds good, but it always costs jobs. Employers didn't suddenly get extra money because the government raised the minimum wage; they still have to balance the books. I don't want some little old lady who looks just like my grandmother to go without drugs, but you can't come up with a solution to a problem that you never look at honestly.
What I did see of Kerry looked half-way decent; he actually showed some energy and modulated his voice--the things real human beings do when talking. He was actually going so fast, I thought maybe he had to pee. With the predictable media spin in his favor, this will go down as a home run, and nobody will give a shit about content.
I still don't get why he keeps emphasizing his time in Viet Nam--he was there 4 months. I'm not trying to take anything away from his service, but the way they try to use those 4 months to cover his 20 years of voting against the military and lying about war crimes and make him look like a commander-in-chief--there isn't enough material in 4 months to cover all those holes.
I sure hope when the Republicans finally start their campaign, they really show us something, because I do not want 4 years of this guy. We're just getting to the point where the bad guys and allies and whatever the hell you call countries like France actually believe us when we say we're going to do something. If Kerry wins, he's going to owe the lunatic left big time and I think it'll be the Iraqis who'll end up footing the bill. It'll be like Viet Nam, Kerry's favorite war. He'll declare the Iraqis ready to stand on their own, walk away, and call it peace.
Update
OK, another thing as long as I'm babbling on. This bit about the flag belongs to no one party... What in the world does that mean? Did Republicans steal all the Democrats flags? For crying out loud, if you guys want to wave them, then wave them. Who the hell's stopping you? Republicans are supposed to stop waving flags because you guys just don't feel like it? Maybe we need an political party flag rationing bill. No party is allowed to display more than x number of flags per event. Or everyone is limited to one tasteful lapel pin and that's it.